The Myth of Mozart’s Sight-Reading Genius

A Closer Examination

In the 18th century, exaggerated accounts of Mozart’s abilities were as common as they were fantastical. Yet, detailed reports from figures like Daines Barrington and André Grétry reveal a far more human side of the prodigy, whose skills, impressive though they were, did not amount to the miraculous feats often attributed to him.

Mozart: The Fall of the Gods

This book offers a fresh and critical look at the life of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, challenging the myths that have surrounded him for centuries. We strip away the romanticised image of the “natural genius” and delve into the contradictions within Mozart’s extensive biographies. Backed by nearly 2,000 meticulously sourced citations, this work invites readers to explore a deeper, more complex understanding of Mozart. Perfect for those who wish to question the traditional narrative, this biography is a must-read for serious music lovers and historians.

"Even the most lauded prodigies sometimes hide a kernel of reality beneath layers of myth."

Mozart: The Fall of the Gods

Separating Fact from Fiction in 18th-Century Reports

In the concert posters promoting young Wolfgang Mozart, he was lauded as a prodigy capable of sight-reading even the most difficult pieces flawlessly. Such claims, often more fantastical than credible, warrant closer scrutiny. Two notable contemporary accounts diverge from the usual paternal praise or the laudatory articles seen in 18th-century newspapers. One is a scientific report from London, penned by Daines Barrington (1727–1800), a member of the Royal Society. The report, dating from June 1765, was finalized in 1769 and presented on February 15, 1770, a full five years after the original test.

Barrington was a multifaceted figure: a barrister, antiquarian, and naturalist with a penchant for ornithology and a fascination for musical prodigies. His book, a curious collection of studies ranging from the origins of turkeys to the melodiousness of birds, often employed flowery and exaggerated language. Perhaps Barrington’s fondness for child prodigies contributed to the surge in popularity of such marvels in England. He documented not only the Mozarts but also other youthful musicians like the Wesley brothers and William Crotch. Yet, his approach lacked scientific rigour, often relying on hearsay and questionable sources.

Barrington’s report on Mozart was no exception. In his experiment, he presented a manuscript duet, its composer unspecified, to test Mozart’s sight-reading skills. The piece was from Metastasio’s Demofoonte, arranged for two vocal parts and strings. Curiously, the vocal parts were written in the alto clef, which Barrington highlighted as if it were a major obstacle. Despite this build-up, Wolfgang executed the symphony introduction “masterfully,” as Barrington put it, then sang the upper vocal line while his father Leopold tackled the lower. Leopold faltered, eliciting disapproving looks from his son, who even corrected his mistakes. Barrington claimed that Wolfgang not only sang beautifully but also embellished the accompaniment with violin parts to enhance the musical effect.

A closer analysis reveals that the test was calibrated for both Mozarts, and Wolfgang, not surprisingly, outperformed his father. Stripping away the superlatives, we see that Wolfgang competently played the bass line with his left hand and added occasional violin parts with his right. Impressive for an eight-year-old, certainly, but not the miracle Barrington made it out to be. His comparison of the duet’s difficulty to reading ancient texts like Etruscan and Greek reveals his musical naivety. Instead of a supernatural feat, the performance was a well-practiced skill honed by Leopold to impress the general public.

Even more telling is a different account from André Ernest Modeste Grétry (1741–1813), a professional musician who tested Mozart in Geneva. When Leopold boasted of his son’s sight-reading prowess, Grétry composed a challenging sonata movement in B-flat major. Mozart played it, yet replaced several difficult passages with his own improvisations. The audience, except Grétry, was in awe. Grétry’s skepticism highlighted Wolfgang’s reliance on improvisation and lack of systematic study, a strategy that gave the illusion of mastery.

Mozart’s ability to read music, while exceptional for his age, fell short of true sight-reading as it’s defined today: a flawless, spontaneous execution of written music, requiring years of rigorous training and experience. Grétry’s observations dispel the myth of Mozart’s innate genius, pointing instead to his reliance on quick-thinking and a boldness typical of children.

 

You May Also Like

K.143: A Recitative and Aria in the Shadows of Doubt

K.143: A Recitative and Aria in the Shadows of Doubt

K.143 is a prime example of how Mozart scholarship has turned uncertainty into myth. With no definitive evidence of authorship, date, or purpose, this uninspired recitative and aria in G major likely originated elsewhere. Is it time to admit this is not Mozart’s work at all?

The Enigma of Mozart’s Symphony K.73

The Enigma of Mozart’s Symphony K.73

The Symphony in C Major K.73 has long puzzled Mozart scholars. Touted as a youthful work of prodigious talent, its origins are murky at best. The title “Symphony,” inscribed on the first page of the autograph, is devoid of the composer’s name, casting immediate doubt on its attribution to Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Was this truly his work, or is the Symphony yet another victim of overzealous attribution?

Bologna Connections

Bologna Connections

Quirino Gasparini’s rediscovered Mitridate aria takes centre stage in Bern and Basel, shedding light on Mozart’s reliance on this forgotten composer.

International Traetta Award

International Traetta Award

We are thrilled to announce that the 14th International Traetta Award has been bestowed upon Anna Trombetta and Luca Bianchini. This prestigious recognition honours their outstanding dedication to musicological research on primary sources of the European musical repertoire, offering significant contributions to reshaping the historiography of 18th-century music.

A Legacy Rewritten by the Shadows of History

A Legacy Rewritten by the Shadows of History

Mozart’s image, often regarded as a universal symbol of musical genius, was heavily manipulated by the Nazi regime, a fact largely ignored in post-war efforts to “denazify” German culture. From propaganda-driven films to anti-Semitic narratives, Mozart’s legacy is far more complex and troubling than we are often led to believe.

Unveiling the Truth Behind Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue

Unveiling the Truth Behind Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue

Anna Trombetta, Professor Martin W. B. Jarvis from Charles Darwin University, and Luca Bianchini, have published a peer-reviewed article titled Unveiling a New Sophisticated Ink Analysis Technique, and Digital Image Processing: A Forensic Examination of Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue. This research, which underwent an extensive double-blind peer review, has appeared in a journal that serves as a global reference point for forensic document examiners and court specialists.